<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Married Saints &#8211; Why so few?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pathsoflove.com/blog/2009/07/married-saints-why-so-few/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pathsoflove.com/blog/2009/07/married-saints-why-so-few/</link>
	<description>A Catholic blog on the vocation to love and holiness, on the thought of St. Thomas Aquinas, and on diverse theological and philosophical questions.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:12:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachael</title>
		<link>http://www.pathsoflove.com/blog/2009/07/married-saints-why-so-few/#comment-9648</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 20:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pathsoflove.com/blog2/?p=79#comment-9648</guid>
		<description>Just to clarify, I&#039;m not saying that the Church teaches that marriage and sex are bad.  I&#039;m saying that negativity towards marriage and sex is very much a part of Catholic culture, just as negativity towards alcohol and parties is a part of Protestant culture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to clarify, I'm not saying that the Church teaches that marriage and sex are bad.  I'm saying that negativity towards marriage and sex is very much a part of Catholic culture, just as negativity towards alcohol and parties is a part of Protestant culture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachael</title>
		<link>http://www.pathsoflove.com/blog/2009/07/married-saints-why-so-few/#comment-9643</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 18:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pathsoflove.com/blog2/?p=79#comment-9643</guid>
		<description>*sigh*  Reading things like this make me so thankful that I was raised Protestant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*sigh*  Reading things like this make me so thankful that I was raised Protestant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Wright</title>
		<link>http://www.pathsoflove.com/blog/2009/07/married-saints-why-so-few/#comment-9224</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 01:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pathsoflove.com/blog2/?p=79#comment-9224</guid>
		<description>Joseph, 
Great answer.
In Christo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joseph,<br />
Great answer.<br />
In Christo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mercury</title>
		<link>http://www.pathsoflove.com/blog/2009/07/married-saints-why-so-few/#comment-8592</link>
		<dc:creator>Mercury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 08:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pathsoflove.com/blog2/?p=79#comment-8592</guid>
		<description>Mirriam, you can read any Catholic teaching on the matter for the past 150 years or more, including papal encyclicals.

Marriage is a sacrament and is holy even for those who cannot conceive. 

You seem to assume that sex is de facto bad and must be &quot;excused&quot; by procreation. This is NOT what the Catholic Church teaches. Period.

And actually your &quot;for any other reason seems bad to me&quot; is contrary to scripture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mirriam, you can read any Catholic teaching on the matter for the past 150 years or more, including papal encyclicals.</p>
<p>Marriage is a sacrament and is holy even for those who cannot conceive. </p>
<p>You seem to assume that sex is de facto bad and must be "excused" by procreation. This is NOT what the Catholic Church teaches. Period.</p>
<p>And actually your "for any other reason seems bad to me" is contrary to scripture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mirriam</title>
		<link>http://www.pathsoflove.com/blog/2009/07/married-saints-why-so-few/#comment-7722</link>
		<dc:creator>Mirriam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 23:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pathsoflove.com/blog2/?p=79#comment-7722</guid>
		<description>I have been wondering about this too. I know the marriage state is holy but I cant get over the whole sex thing. I just have a difficult time seeing it as good. It only seems good to me if it is for the sake of procreating children. If the couple has sex for any other reason it seems bad to me. Trying to comprehend how it can be holy besides for the sake of children?

True love to me is to be brothers and sisters to all your fellow christians. That the only difference between friendship and the marriage state is begetting children. This is the only way I can think of it in a holy way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been wondering about this too. I know the marriage state is holy but I cant get over the whole sex thing. I just have a difficult time seeing it as good. It only seems good to me if it is for the sake of procreating children. If the couple has sex for any other reason it seems bad to me. Trying to comprehend how it can be holy besides for the sake of children?</p>
<p>True love to me is to be brothers and sisters to all your fellow christians. That the only difference between friendship and the marriage state is begetting children. This is the only way I can think of it in a holy way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maria</title>
		<link>http://www.pathsoflove.com/blog/2009/07/married-saints-why-so-few/#comment-5912</link>
		<dc:creator>Maria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 15:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pathsoflove.com/blog2/?p=79#comment-5912</guid>
		<description>I agree with you that marriage is a challenge, but because of that it is perfect context to become a Saint. 

I also agree that it is a long procedure to prove someone was a Saint, religous and priests are part of an organization that does the paperwork to Canonize the Saint. 

Us married couples would have to rely on our children to do the procedure to be canonized, with four teens I feel this is very hard, because even though us parents in many cases have rightness of intent when we correct and form our children, they do not seem to think so.

But there is good news for married couples, the process of beatification of several couples has started and when they are Saints of our Universal Church, they will lead the way for others. 

As you say let&#039;s not do the metrics on who has been canonized. Lets struggle to have God centered lives. Remember the best canonization is being with HIM eternally. 

Thanks, Maria</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you that marriage is a challenge, but because of that it is perfect context to become a Saint. </p>
<p>I also agree that it is a long procedure to prove someone was a Saint, religous and priests are part of an organization that does the paperwork to Canonize the Saint. </p>
<p>Us married couples would have to rely on our children to do the procedure to be canonized, with four teens I feel this is very hard, because even though us parents in many cases have rightness of intent when we correct and form our children, they do not seem to think so.</p>
<p>But there is good news for married couples, the process of beatification of several couples has started and when they are Saints of our Universal Church, they will lead the way for others. </p>
<p>As you say let's not do the metrics on who has been canonized. Lets struggle to have God centered lives. Remember the best canonization is being with HIM eternally. </p>
<p>Thanks, Maria</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregory</title>
		<link>http://www.pathsoflove.com/blog/2009/07/married-saints-why-so-few/#comment-4618</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 20:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pathsoflove.com/blog2/?p=79#comment-4618</guid>
		<description>It is a striking irony, isn&#039;t it:  We have a &lt;strong&gt;sacrament&lt;/strong&gt; for marriage, whereas religious life is entered by vows (which can be dispensed), yet by far most canonized saints are religious, not married laity.  If religious life is a more sure means to holiness, why does it not deserve a sacrament?  Just sayin.

I would stack up the rigors of marriage to the rigors of celibate religious life any day. I have known religious and clergy who were previously married (spouses died, etc.), and they all testified to me that married life was harder than celibate life.  Not that either is easy (is there any easy path in life?), but the demands for self-sacrifice are unending in marriage.  As for Aquinas and his comment about sex being the highest pleasure on earth, well, after ten years of having sex with the same person, couples universally testify that sex becomes a challenge of love, not an easy source of pleasure!

I would say the fact of canonized saints being mostly religious must be due to the ability to collect evidence for the procedure.  Religious and priests live pretty public lives, with numerous witnesses to how they live their lives.  Married couples raising children, up until this day and age anyway, led lives that the historical records have a hard time tracking.

Anyway, we shouldn&#039;t overstate the importance of it all.  We should be focused on leading lives of love, not feeling like second-class members of the Church because of who is or isn&#039;t canonized.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a striking irony, isn't it:  We have a <strong>sacrament</strong> for marriage, whereas religious life is entered by vows (which can be dispensed), yet by far most canonized saints are religious, not married laity.  If religious life is a more sure means to holiness, why does it not deserve a sacrament?  Just sayin.</p>
<p>I would stack up the rigors of marriage to the rigors of celibate religious life any day. I have known religious and clergy who were previously married (spouses died, etc.), and they all testified to me that married life was harder than celibate life.  Not that either is easy (is there any easy path in life?), but the demands for self-sacrifice are unending in marriage.  As for Aquinas and his comment about sex being the highest pleasure on earth, well, after ten years of having sex with the same person, couples universally testify that sex becomes a challenge of love, not an easy source of pleasure!</p>
<p>I would say the fact of canonized saints being mostly religious must be due to the ability to collect evidence for the procedure.  Religious and priests live pretty public lives, with numerous witnesses to how they live their lives.  Married couples raising children, up until this day and age anyway, led lives that the historical records have a hard time tracking.</p>
<p>Anyway, we shouldn't overstate the importance of it all.  We should be focused on leading lives of love, not feeling like second-class members of the Church because of who is or isn't canonized.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Bolin</title>
		<link>http://www.pathsoflove.com/blog/2009/07/married-saints-why-so-few/#comment-3514</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Bolin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 06:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pathsoflove.com/blog2/?p=79#comment-3514</guid>
		<description>Though you merely give basic data without commenting on it, if I understand it correctly, you are saying that those to be married are &lt;i&gt;already&lt;/i&gt; saints. This is using the term &quot;saint&quot; in a different meaning than in the post, unless you are implying that you have already attained the goal of &lt;i&gt;perfect&lt;/i&gt; conformity to Christ, though St. Paul had not: &quot;Not that I have already obtained this or am already perfect; but I press on to make it my own, because Christ Jesus has made me his own&quot; (Philippians 3:12).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though you merely give basic data without commenting on it, if I understand it correctly, you are saying that those to be married are <i>already</i> saints. This is using the term "saint" in a different meaning than in the post, unless you are implying that you have already attained the goal of <i>perfect</i> conformity to Christ, though St. Paul had not: "Not that I have already obtained this or am already perfect; but I press on to make it my own, because Christ Jesus has made me his own" (Philippians 3:12).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew j.b.hastie</title>
		<link>http://www.pathsoflove.com/blog/2009/07/married-saints-why-so-few/#comment-3506</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew j.b.hastie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 01:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pathsoflove.com/blog2/?p=79#comment-3506</guid>
		<description>18th april 2011:
betrothed fiance:andrew j.b.hastie
engaged fiancee:jodie a.c. foster
proposal documentation:saints to be married
church:baptist anabaptist separatist protestant</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>18th april 2011:<br />
betrothed fiance:andrew j.b.hastie<br />
engaged fiancee:jodie a.c. foster<br />
proposal documentation:saints to be married<br />
church:baptist anabaptist separatist protestant</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Bolin</title>
		<link>http://www.pathsoflove.com/blog/2009/07/married-saints-why-so-few/#comment-366</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Bolin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 08:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pathsoflove.com/blog2/?p=79#comment-366</guid>
		<description>In order to avoid a very long and difficult to follow comment thread, as well as on account of the fact that for a long time I haven&#039;t had opportunity to post on this blog, I have written a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pathsoflove.com/blog/2011/01/married-saints-and-continence/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;post&lt;/a&gt; that makes a &lt;i&gt;beginning&lt;/i&gt; of addressing some of these questions, though it is far from completing answering them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In order to avoid a very long and difficult to follow comment thread, as well as on account of the fact that for a long time I haven't had opportunity to post on this blog, I have written a <a href="http://www.pathsoflove.com/blog/2011/01/married-saints-and-continence/" rel="nofollow">post</a> that makes a <i>beginning</i> of addressing some of these questions, though it is far from completing answering them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

